<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Value of Being Cavalier</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2015/10/the-value-of-being-cavalier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/10/the-value-of-being-cavalier/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 18:10:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alrenous</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/10/the-value-of-being-cavalier/comment-page-1/#comment-2409168</link>
		<dc:creator>Alrenous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39006#comment-2409168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a bureaucracy, there is no upside for excellence, only downside for failure. Bureaucrats must CYA to survive, which usually means passing the buck to some rulership algorithm. Hence the smart money is on seizing the algorithm, which is currently done through advisory white papers. Even in the rare case the algorithm is held responsible for bad outcomes, between the nonpersonal algorithm not objecting to its demonization and the writer and adviser being able to blame each other, responsibility is successfully laundered.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a bureaucracy, there is no upside for excellence, only downside for failure. Bureaucrats must CYA to survive, which usually means passing the buck to some rulership algorithm. Hence the smart money is on seizing the algorithm, which is currently done through advisory white papers. Even in the rare case the algorithm is held responsible for bad outcomes, between the nonpersonal algorithm not objecting to its demonization and the writer and adviser being able to blame each other, responsibility is successfully laundered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Foster</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/10/the-value-of-being-cavalier/comment-page-1/#comment-2408974</link>
		<dc:creator>David Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2015 19:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39006#comment-2408974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting post.  &quot;Pretty much every prestigious career track involves not personal command but prolonged institutional subordination.&quot;

This relates to the old distinction between &quot;Line&quot; and &quot;Staff&quot; positions, where Line positions involve decision-making authority and accountability for results, whereas Staff positions involve analyzing and recommending, but not deciding and dealing with the consequences.

I think a high % of recent college graduates (especially those with postgraduate degrees) today prefer the Staff roles: they would rather write recommendations of &quot;Optimum Sales and Manufacturing Strategies for Universal Entities Corporation&quot; than go run a sales region for that company, or (heaven forbid!) a manufacturing facility.  If they are in government, they would rather write papers about &quot;Transportation in the Year 2040&quot; than run the Atlanta Tower for the FAA.

Unfortunately, the historical policy that people need to have lower-level Line experience before being put in a higher-level Line job has eroded.  There are too many cases in which a person who has spent years in Staff positions (with the exception of a couple of pseudo-jobs, like 6 months as a sales manager) get promoted into important Line jobs in which failure will have severe consequences.  The ultimate example of this, of course, is Barack Obama.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post.  &#8220;Pretty much every prestigious career track involves not personal command but prolonged institutional subordination.&#8221;</p>
<p>This relates to the old distinction between &#8220;Line&#8221; and &#8220;Staff&#8221; positions, where Line positions involve decision-making authority and accountability for results, whereas Staff positions involve analyzing and recommending, but not deciding and dealing with the consequences.</p>
<p>I think a high % of recent college graduates (especially those with postgraduate degrees) today prefer the Staff roles: they would rather write recommendations of &#8220;Optimum Sales and Manufacturing Strategies for Universal Entities Corporation&#8221; than go run a sales region for that company, or (heaven forbid!) a manufacturing facility.  If they are in government, they would rather write papers about &#8220;Transportation in the Year 2040&#8243; than run the Atlanta Tower for the FAA.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the historical policy that people need to have lower-level Line experience before being put in a higher-level Line job has eroded.  There are too many cases in which a person who has spent years in Staff positions (with the exception of a couple of pseudo-jobs, like 6 months as a sales manager) get promoted into important Line jobs in which failure will have severe consequences.  The ultimate example of this, of course, is Barack Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Sykes</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/10/the-value-of-being-cavalier/comment-page-1/#comment-2408024</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Sykes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 12:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=39006#comment-2408024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Putin seems to meet your ideal of aristocrats in action.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Putin seems to meet your ideal of aristocrats in action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
