<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Precisely the Wrong Stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2015/06/precisely-the-wrong-stuff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/06/precisely-the-wrong-stuff/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 23:05:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alrenous</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/06/precisely-the-wrong-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-2323239</link>
		<dc:creator>Alrenous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 18:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=38277#comment-2323239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Break neurotypical humans of the status addiction? Yeah, good luck with that.

Even better, if you do, it&#039;s questionable how much it will help. Yes, when errors occur someone is usually aware they&#039;re occurring. However, consider the broken window fallacy: how many times someone thinks an error is occurring when it isn&#039;t, which means there&#039;s no inquest and nobody is asked if they would have spoken up. There are a few settings where everyone will speak up. They are very leftist, which may matter, but it just means the signal-to-noise ratio is atrocious. 

As a non-neurotypical I can get around this by soliciting advice. &quot;Hey everyone, am I about to fix the broken part?&quot; It freaks people out, though. They start thinking I&#039;m less competent, even though I just lowered my risk rate, so I only do it when I personally care about the outcome.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Break neurotypical humans of the status addiction? Yeah, good luck with that.</p>
<p>Even better, if you do, it&#8217;s questionable how much it will help. Yes, when errors occur someone is usually aware they&#8217;re occurring. However, consider the broken window fallacy: how many times someone thinks an error is occurring when it isn&#8217;t, which means there&#8217;s no inquest and nobody is asked if they would have spoken up. There are a few settings where everyone will speak up. They are very leftist, which may matter, but it just means the signal-to-noise ratio is atrocious. </p>
<p>As a non-neurotypical I can get around this by soliciting advice. &#8220;Hey everyone, am I about to fix the broken part?&#8221; It freaks people out, though. They start thinking I&#8217;m less competent, even though I just lowered my risk rate, so I only do it when I personally care about the outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
