Gentrification in Baltimore

Monday, May 18th, 2015

The fact of urban gentrification in Baltimore is that hipster homesteaders have moved into traditional working-class white enclaves:

These areas were sought by the first hipster pioneers to benefit from the protection of the tough whites in those areas who had held out against the black-on-white race purge that was the 70’s and 80’s in Baltimore. The end result is that the housing values go up so much that the working and poor whites must move out as they can’t pay the taxes.

Recently, beginning in the 2000s, Johns Hopkins University and Hospital have been buying up vast swaths of vacant property in East Baltimore [where Boomy the Nigerian cabby rescued the ‘blonde woman of the yuppies’] and along the Charles Village Corridor. This was in response to blacks preying on hospital and university staff. These large institutions are buying up the criminal seed beds which constitute perhaps a third of the black Baltimore economy [with welfare constituting roughly another third]. This has caused more damage to the drug gangs than any police action, and is covered in the final season of The Wire. Over the past two years a concerted effort to discourage white resettlement of Baltimore has been made by black criminal residents. However, the news spin and statistical manipulation engaged in by the leftist city government has successfully blinded the prospective home buyers of these facts until it is too late.

It is no accident that the prime targets of the mob attacks were the Shoppers supermarket [which was successfully defended thanks to the early warnings put out by black cashiers from the neighborhood], and the CVS drug store which the Mayor gave orders not to defend. Both of these locations were only established due to city government initiatives to bring businesses into the neighborhood.

Note that the most successful pockets of gentrification such as South Baltimore, Locust Point and Canton, fared better than the Hopkins controlled areas and the others, because they are neighborhoods with their backs against the water, and raiders have only one way out, with Locust Point, which terminates in Fort Mchenry National Park, being a virtual fortified position.

With the white trash priced out of the community, the protective basis for resettlement is now gone. Without nasty whites to fight the blacks at street level, and with the police now exposed as enfeebled, the hunt for Whitey is on in earnest. This is how I have lived my life, as a white hunted by blacks across an urban crimescape, what H.L Mencken famously called, “the ruins of a once great medieval city.”

Comments

  1. Slovenian Guest says:

    Lafond on Reed: The Crazy Uncle You Wish You Had

    If you are a right-of-guilt white guy who has become sick of being labeled a white supremacist just because you have failed to submit to our culture’s demand that we express fear, love, respect, pity and perpetual moral dept to 11% of the U.S population just because their dirt-poor ancestor was raped by the ancestor of some superrich southern fried aristocrat, while your dirt-poor ancestor was trying to escape from some other rich European creep and get the hell across the Atlantic, I think you will find Fred to be a breath of fresh air.

    His discussion on why he prefers to live in a world of cultural variety as opposed to mass cultural homogenization is quite a heroic spit in the political wind.

    Only in America can a man who worked in the D.C. ghetto, travelled in Africa, and moved to Mexico to shack up with some Aztec babe, and advertises Spanish language lessons on his website, be branded a racist.

    That’s a great term, “right-of-guilt”.

  2. T. Greer says:

    “criminal seed beds which constitute perhaps a third of the black Baltimore economy [with welfare constituting roughly another third].”

    Those who try to pass off speculation as statistics annoy me.

  3. Isegoria says:

    While I’ve been citing Lafond, things seem to have come full circle.

Leave a Reply