<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science Education and Liberal Education</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2015/04/science-education-and-liberal-education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/04/science-education-and-liberal-education/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 23:29:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alrenous</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/04/science-education-and-liberal-education/comment-page-1/#comment-2245820</link>
		<dc:creator>Alrenous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 21:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=37823#comment-2245820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The kind of assertions that would make physics post-modern aren&#039;t epistemically different than the kind of assertions that make university history post-modern, so it puzzles me that not only does the distinction exist, but it follows a clear gradient.

In economics, they say X will happen, and it does not. Explaining it away works. Post-modern physics would be identical; it would say an atom smasher should make output X, when in fact you get Y. However, in this case explaining it away does not work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The kind of assertions that would make physics post-modern aren&#8217;t epistemically different than the kind of assertions that make university history post-modern, so it puzzles me that not only does the distinction exist, but it follows a clear gradient.</p>
<p>In economics, they say X will happen, and it does not. Explaining it away works. Post-modern physics would be identical; it would say an atom smasher should make output X, when in fact you get Y. However, in this case explaining it away does not work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
