<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2015/01/political-diversity-will-improve-social-psychological-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/01/political-diversity-will-improve-social-psychological-science/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 06:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magus Janus</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2015/01/political-diversity-will-improve-social-psychological-science/comment-page-1/#comment-2058556</link>
		<dc:creator>Magus Janus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 21:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=37147#comment-2058556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem is that progressive social scientists have no incentive to encourage their ideological opponents to enter the field. It&#039;s about ideological war here, not &quot;being correct.&quot;  Some few and far between with integrity might obviously bring up the issue, but the average prog in the field? He couldn&#039;t give a $h!+ and will rationalize it away with &quot;conservatives are anti science&quot; or &quot;reality has a liberal bias&quot; what have you.

Which is ironic, since the exact opposite is far more likely in the social sciences, i.e. reality having a &quot;right wing&quot; bias.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that progressive social scientists have no incentive to encourage their ideological opponents to enter the field. It&#8217;s about ideological war here, not &#8220;being correct.&#8221;  Some few and far between with integrity might obviously bring up the issue, but the average prog in the field? He couldn&#8217;t give a $h!+ and will rationalize it away with &#8220;conservatives are anti science&#8221; or &#8220;reality has a liberal bias&#8221; what have you.</p>
<p>Which is ironic, since the exact opposite is far more likely in the social sciences, i.e. reality having a &#8220;right wing&#8221; bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
