<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Role of Hate</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2014/12/the-role-of-hate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2014/12/the-role-of-hate/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 21:33:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James James</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2014/12/the-role-of-hate/comment-page-1/#comment-2001849</link>
		<dc:creator>James James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 08:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=36930#comment-2001849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;enemy units did not and would not surrender in large numbers until faced with maneuver units on the ground and in their rear.&quot;

Grossman&#039;s psychological interpretation seems less likely than the standard practical interpretation. 

The standard interpretation of this is that you can&#039;t achieve strategic objectives purely through airpower -- you need boots on the ground. For example, NATO bombed Serbia for weeks with little result until they started talking about a ground force. One reason is that without boots on the ground, there&#039;s no one to surrender to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;enemy units did not and would not surrender in large numbers until faced with maneuver units on the ground and in their rear.&#8221;</p>
<p>Grossman&#8217;s psychological interpretation seems less likely than the standard practical interpretation. </p>
<p>The standard interpretation of this is that you can&#8217;t achieve strategic objectives purely through airpower &#8212; you need boots on the ground. For example, NATO bombed Serbia for weeks with little result until they started talking about a ground force. One reason is that without boots on the ground, there&#8217;s no one to surrender to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
