<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super-Intelligent Humans Are Coming</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2014/10/super-intelligent-humans-are-coming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2014/10/super-intelligent-humans-are-coming/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 21:33:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwern</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2014/10/super-intelligent-humans-are-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-1684946</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=36510#comment-1684946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Candide III: 

How much has diminishing returns set in for various forms of plant and animal breeding (oil content, milk yield, meat yield, feed-to-meat conversion efficiency, growth rate)? Or for very long-term selection experiments like the E. coli experiment? Yes, maybe there&#039;s some upper limit to human biology where diminishing returns sets in sharply, but given that there are thousands of variants influencing intelligence, no one has ever come close to having all of the good ones. (Imagine we could only manufacture +7SD humans instead of +10SD. Would that make much of a difference to how wrong people like you were?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Candide III: </p>
<p>How much has diminishing returns set in for various forms of plant and animal breeding (oil content, milk yield, meat yield, feed-to-meat conversion efficiency, growth rate)? Or for very long-term selection experiments like the E. coli experiment? Yes, maybe there&#8217;s some upper limit to human biology where diminishing returns sets in sharply, but given that there are thousands of variants influencing intelligence, no one has ever come close to having all of the good ones. (Imagine we could only manufacture +7SD humans instead of +10SD. Would that make much of a difference to how wrong people like you were?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candide III</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2014/10/super-intelligent-humans-are-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-1679922</link>
		<dc:creator>Candide III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 19:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=36510#comment-1679922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He&#039;s making a completely unwarranted assumption that the effect of additional alleles on IQ will be linear. Given the universal applicability of the law of diminishing returns, I&#039;d be very surprised if this turned out the case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s making a completely unwarranted assumption that the effect of additional alleles on IQ will be linear. Given the universal applicability of the law of diminishing returns, I&#8217;d be very surprised if this turned out the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert E.</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2014/10/super-intelligent-humans-are-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-1679649</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=36510#comment-1679649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Chinese are at the forefront of this reputedly. They do not have moral restrictions on selective breeding of humans for positive traits.

This doctor on talk radio a number of years ago suggested that this has been going on for some time or has been contemplated for some time. Breed two types of humans. One very smart and the other not so smart but docile enough to be controllable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chinese are at the forefront of this reputedly. They do not have moral restrictions on selective breeding of humans for positive traits.</p>
<p>This doctor on talk radio a number of years ago suggested that this has been going on for some time or has been contemplated for some time. Breed two types of humans. One very smart and the other not so smart but docile enough to be controllable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
