<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Key Shifts of the SAT Redesign</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2014/03/key-shifts-of-the-sat-redesign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2014/03/key-shifts-of-the-sat-redesign/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 23:10:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2014/03/key-shifts-of-the-sat-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-1147175</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 17:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=34424#comment-1147175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The move away from penalizing wrong guesses is no surprise. After all, if multiculturalism is true, there probably aren&#039;t any (singular) correct answers anyway.

One wonders, though, whether this is the right way to train (for example) doctors, engineers, scientists, etc. After all, it&#039;s important for a doctor to KNOW whether or not he has the right dosage, it&#039;s important for the civil engineer to &lt;em&gt;know&lt;/em&gt; if the bridge will stand up, etc.

As Dan says (above), maybe the SAT will once again produce a score that correlates with IQ. I doubt it. (Remember who funds colleges and university these days.) The reason is that innate &lt;em&gt;ability&lt;/em&gt; is not as important as diversity and a cheerful acceptance of corporate workloads. The last thing corporations want is smart people inclined to question everything. What they want are &lt;em&gt;prepared&lt;/em&gt; workers who have demonstrated their ability to work hard to complete their assignments on time no matter how much work is involved and no matter how pointless it is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The move away from penalizing wrong guesses is no surprise. After all, if multiculturalism is true, there probably aren&#8217;t any (singular) correct answers anyway.</p>
<p>One wonders, though, whether this is the right way to train (for example) doctors, engineers, scientists, etc. After all, it&#8217;s important for a doctor to KNOW whether or not he has the right dosage, it&#8217;s important for the civil engineer to <em>know</em> if the bridge will stand up, etc.</p>
<p>As Dan says (above), maybe the SAT will once again produce a score that correlates with IQ. I doubt it. (Remember who funds colleges and university these days.) The reason is that innate <em>ability</em> is not as important as diversity and a cheerful acceptance of corporate workloads. The last thing corporations want is smart people inclined to question everything. What they want are <em>prepared</em> workers who have demonstrated their ability to work hard to complete their assignments on time no matter how much work is involved and no matter how pointless it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Kurt</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2014/03/key-shifts-of-the-sat-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-1146075</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 23:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=34424#comment-1146075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps in time the SATs will return to being an IQ test as it once was.

Bring back the analogies.

Dan Kurt

P.S. In 1958 when I took the SATs they were my ticket out of the lower middle class and into the Ivy League.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps in time the SATs will return to being an IQ test as it once was.</p>
<p>Bring back the analogies.</p>
<p>Dan Kurt</p>
<p>P.S. In 1958 when I took the SATs they were my ticket out of the lower middle class and into the Ivy League.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
