<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Delusions of Grandeur</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2014/01/delusions-of-grandeur/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2014/01/delusions-of-grandeur/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 20:20:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toddy Cat</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2014/01/delusions-of-grandeur/comment-page-1/#comment-1094063</link>
		<dc:creator>Toddy Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 16:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=33831#comment-1094063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it&#039;s probably true that more Third-world countries could learn from Mexico. One thing that seems to be unusual about &quot;Development&quot; experts is that they seldom seem to actually look at success stories, like Japan, or Thailand, or Mexico, because the way that they achieved relative prosperity does not accord with current developmental dogma. Although, to be fair, Mexico did have some advantages that would be hard to duplicate. Being right next door to the most prosperous and powerful country on earth, being able to export the poorest portion of its population, a vast and rich resource base &#8212; these advantages would not be replicable in every country. But yeah, all of Fehrenbach&#039;s writing deserves to be better known than it is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s probably true that more Third-world countries could learn from Mexico. One thing that seems to be unusual about &#8220;Development&#8221; experts is that they seldom seem to actually look at success stories, like Japan, or Thailand, or Mexico, because the way that they achieved relative prosperity does not accord with current developmental dogma. Although, to be fair, Mexico did have some advantages that would be hard to duplicate. Being right next door to the most prosperous and powerful country on earth, being able to export the poorest portion of its population, a vast and rich resource base &mdash; these advantages would not be replicable in every country. But yeah, all of Fehrenbach&#8217;s writing deserves to be better known than it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2014/01/delusions-of-grandeur/comment-page-1/#comment-1093204</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=33831#comment-1093204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honest politics is rare, sure. Fehrenbach&#039;s history of Mexico, &lt;b&gt;Fire and Blood&lt;/b&gt;, suggests it may well describe Mexico&#039;s 1920-1970 &lt;b&gt;successful&lt;/b&gt; effort to build a middle class. That&#039;s a rare success. I can&#039;t think of many other successful efforts to build a middle class.

I&#039;m not accusing Carlos Slim of personal integrity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honest politics is rare, sure. Fehrenbach&#8217;s history of Mexico, <b>Fire and Blood</b>, suggests it may well describe Mexico&#8217;s 1920-1970 <b>successful</b> effort to build a middle class. That&#8217;s a rare success. I can&#8217;t think of many other successful efforts to build a middle class.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not accusing Carlos Slim of personal integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Congo Sam</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2014/01/delusions-of-grandeur/comment-page-1/#comment-1092543</link>
		<dc:creator>Congo Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 12:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=33831#comment-1092543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce, I&#039;ve heard the rulers of Mexico called a number of things, but &quot;honest&quot; is a new one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce, I&#8217;ve heard the rulers of Mexico called a number of things, but &#8220;honest&#8221; is a new one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2014/01/delusions-of-grandeur/comment-page-1/#comment-1091711</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 23:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=33831#comment-1091711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mexico has a pretty solid &quot;no permanent friends, only changing interests&quot; foreign policy. It&#039;s got a solid middle class &#8212; after about fifty years of honest hard work by the whatever they call the permanent political party nowadays. We underestimate that in America because 1) they want us to, 2) they send us the poorest third of their population, 3) racist arrogance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mexico has a pretty solid &#8220;no permanent friends, only changing interests&#8221; foreign policy. It&#8217;s got a solid middle class &mdash; after about fifty years of honest hard work by the whatever they call the permanent political party nowadays. We underestimate that in America because 1) they want us to, 2) they send us the poorest third of their population, 3) racist arrogance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alrenous</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2014/01/delusions-of-grandeur/comment-page-1/#comment-1091358</link>
		<dc:creator>Alrenous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=33831#comment-1091358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strongly agree.

Nitpicks: Boot has an obvious pro-scholar bias. (Anti-merchant anti-warrior.) Second a blindness to non-Jesus sources of meaning; he sits on a false dilemma between modern materialism and Abraham&#039;s scions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strongly agree.</p>
<p>Nitpicks: Boot has an obvious pro-scholar bias. (Anti-merchant anti-warrior.) Second a blindness to non-Jesus sources of meaning; he sits on a false dilemma between modern materialism and Abraham&#8217;s scions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
