<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Put Down That Highlighter!</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2013/09/put-down-that-highlighter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2013/09/put-down-that-highlighter/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 15:46:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Kurt</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2013/09/put-down-that-highlighter/comment-page-1/#comment-951897</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 19:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=32631#comment-951897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My career has been in a science so this is what worked for me.

Math: doing problems and more problems and more problems from algebra past higher math. Do every problem in the book. It gets easier. Twenty five to thirty problems a day sees to be a good amount

Chemistry and Physics: do the problems and more problems.

Keep in a loose-leaf binder the problems with solutions. Buy more binders.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My career has been in a science so this is what worked for me.</p>
<p>Math: doing problems and more problems and more problems from algebra past higher math. Do every problem in the book. It gets easier. Twenty five to thirty problems a day sees to be a good amount</p>
<p>Chemistry and Physics: do the problems and more problems.</p>
<p>Keep in a loose-leaf binder the problems with solutions. Buy more binders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isegoria</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2013/09/put-down-that-highlighter/comment-page-1/#comment-951790</link>
		<dc:creator>Isegoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 16:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=32631#comment-951790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;re completely correct that studying a dense text means &lt;em&gt;re&lt;/em&gt;reading and pondering.  I think it&#039;s the pondering that matters most though.  You need to struggle with the material to learn it.  If the text is sufficiently dense, simply rereading it may be a worthy struggle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re completely correct that studying a dense text means <em>re</em>reading and pondering.  I think it&#8217;s the pondering that matters most though.  You need to struggle with the material to learn it.  If the text is sufficiently dense, simply rereading it may be a worthy struggle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Newman</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2013/09/put-down-that-highlighter/comment-page-1/#comment-951761</link>
		<dc:creator>William Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=32631#comment-951761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my experience rereading (and pondering) is not just helpful but nearly essential when studying a subject which can be described in a small dense text. (E.g., Landau and Lifschitz &lt;cite&gt;Mechanics&lt;/cite&gt;, or Spivak &lt;cite&gt;Calculus on Manifolds&lt;/cite&gt;, or the smallest book I have on my shelves, the Stephenson-Yang lecture notes on &quot;sabaki&quot; in the game of Go.) Quite possibly rereading is less helpful in other cases, and quite possibly in those cases people tend to reread too much. But given the existence of cases where (assuming I&#039;m right, despite my lack of controlled experiment) rereading is nearly essential, the &quot;nearly as bad is the practice of rereading [...] much less effective than some of the better techniques&quot; result reported can&#039;t be quite correct. Perhaps before trying to state categorically whether rereading is not an effective strategy, the researchers and/or the CreativityPost author should back off and try to define the boundaries of their learning problem more carefully.

For comparison, spreading out studying over time really does seem to be helpful in acquiring and retaining knowledge, with no exceptions I can think of. My impression is that that this is a rather general property of thinking and memory, not confined to academic study but also present in e.g. learning sports or learning cooking or learning the geography of an area.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience rereading (and pondering) is not just helpful but nearly essential when studying a subject which can be described in a small dense text. (E.g., Landau and Lifschitz <cite>Mechanics</cite>, or Spivak <cite>Calculus on Manifolds</cite>, or the smallest book I have on my shelves, the Stephenson-Yang lecture notes on &#8220;sabaki&#8221; in the game of Go.) Quite possibly rereading is less helpful in other cases, and quite possibly in those cases people tend to reread too much. But given the existence of cases where (assuming I&#8217;m right, despite my lack of controlled experiment) rereading is nearly essential, the &#8220;nearly as bad is the practice of rereading [...] much less effective than some of the better techniques&#8221; result reported can&#8217;t be quite correct. Perhaps before trying to state categorically whether rereading is not an effective strategy, the researchers and/or the CreativityPost author should back off and try to define the boundaries of their learning problem more carefully.</p>
<p>For comparison, spreading out studying over time really does seem to be helpful in acquiring and retaining knowledge, with no exceptions I can think of. My impression is that that this is a rather general property of thinking and memory, not confined to academic study but also present in e.g. learning sports or learning cooking or learning the geography of an area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
