<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grim Economic Realities</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2013/06/grim-economic-realities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2013/06/grim-economic-realities/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 16:19:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FNN</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2013/06/grim-economic-realities/comment-page-1/#comment-881391</link>
		<dc:creator>FNN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=31961#comment-881391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;&quot;The actual stability of every European state is at risk and a return of 1930s fascism is a real possibility.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Fascism, National Socialism, and the like were mainly reactions to the revolutionary left of the time &#8212; primarily Communism, but also anarchism to some extent.  It could be that the Cultural Marxism today &lt;a href=&quot;http://hailtoyou.wordpress.com/2011/02/05/capitalist-liberal-multicultacracy/&quot;&gt;emanating from America&lt;/a&gt; is the contemporary equivalent of the revolutionary left of that earlier period. The millions marching in France against homosexual marriage and adoption may be a clue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;The actual stability of every European state is at risk and a return of 1930s fascism is a real possibility.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Fascism, National Socialism, and the like were mainly reactions to the revolutionary left of the time &mdash; primarily Communism, but also anarchism to some extent.  It could be that the Cultural Marxism today <a href="http://hailtoyou.wordpress.com/2011/02/05/capitalist-liberal-multicultacracy/">emanating from America</a> is the contemporary equivalent of the revolutionary left of that earlier period. The millions marching in France against homosexual marriage and adoption may be a clue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FNN</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2013/06/grim-economic-realities/comment-page-1/#comment-881381</link>
		<dc:creator>FNN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=31961#comment-881381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;&quot;The actual stability of every European state is at risk and a return of 1930s fascism is a real possibility.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

We&#039;d better start bombing them now before it&#039;s too late!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;The actual stability of every European state is at risk and a return of 1930s fascism is a real possibility.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>We&#8217;d better start bombing them now before it&#8217;s too late!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Sykes</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2013/06/grim-economic-realities/comment-page-1/#comment-881330</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Sykes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=31961#comment-881330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps not surprisingly, this dominance continues to this day. Moreover, demographic trends indicate that it will continue for the rest of this century. Europe, Russia, Japan, Korea (both) and China are all either losing population right now or, as in the case of China, will soon be. 

In the particular case of China, our putative 21st Century competitor, its power vis &#224; vis the US is right now at its peak. In the next decade or so, its population will begin declining. The US population will not. China will end up with fewer people, and they will be increasing elderly and dependent and decreasingly young and productive. China&#039;s economic growth will slow, and eventually it will begin to decline.

Elderly, unproductive, declining populations cannot compete in any arena with young, productive and increasing populations. That is the situation facing all of our competitors.

Europe&#039;s situation is particularly grim. They are importing very large numbers of unskilled, barely literate people, mostly Muslim, who are intensely anti-European. Most of these immigrants are unproductive and dependent on the native populations. The actual stability of every European state is at risk, and a return of 1930s fascism is a real possibility.

America&#039;s native population is reproducing at somewhat less than replacement, but not as severely as Europe&#039;s, and we are growing because of immigration, mostly Mexican and Central American, but generally from everywhere. One advantage we have is that the Mexicans are already Christian and half-Americanized. They do not have the kind of anti-native culture bias that so many Muslims in Europe have. Unfortunately, as in Europe, they are mostly dependent. They are also self-segregating, and California are conducting wars of ethnic cleansing against blacks, whom they generally despise as competitors.

If current demographic trends continue, there will actually be more Americans than Europeans. This depends in part on a continuing robust reproductive rate in Mexico and Central America. Their reproductive rates are also rapidly falling, so the Latino population surplus of the past is likely to disappear, reducing immigration substantially.

Most news media like to quote the UN&#039;s median population predictions, which suggest a world population rising continuously for the foreseeable future and exceeding 9 billion in a couple of decades. However, this projection assumes that each country&#039;s population reproduces at the replacement rate. The world population increase is due to the predominance of young people in the world.

However, in every country in the world, the reproductive rate is falling rapidly. The low population projection uses these rates, and it predicts a maximum  world population of around 8 to 8.5 billion around 2030 and a decline thereafter. Then we (or you, I&#039;ll be dead) enter the great unknown: a dominant USA in a declining world.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps not surprisingly, this dominance continues to this day. Moreover, demographic trends indicate that it will continue for the rest of this century. Europe, Russia, Japan, Korea (both) and China are all either losing population right now or, as in the case of China, will soon be. </p>
<p>In the particular case of China, our putative 21st Century competitor, its power vis &agrave; vis the US is right now at its peak. In the next decade or so, its population will begin declining. The US population will not. China will end up with fewer people, and they will be increasing elderly and dependent and decreasingly young and productive. China&#8217;s economic growth will slow, and eventually it will begin to decline.</p>
<p>Elderly, unproductive, declining populations cannot compete in any arena with young, productive and increasing populations. That is the situation facing all of our competitors.</p>
<p>Europe&#8217;s situation is particularly grim. They are importing very large numbers of unskilled, barely literate people, mostly Muslim, who are intensely anti-European. Most of these immigrants are unproductive and dependent on the native populations. The actual stability of every European state is at risk, and a return of 1930s fascism is a real possibility.</p>
<p>America&#8217;s native population is reproducing at somewhat less than replacement, but not as severely as Europe&#8217;s, and we are growing because of immigration, mostly Mexican and Central American, but generally from everywhere. One advantage we have is that the Mexicans are already Christian and half-Americanized. They do not have the kind of anti-native culture bias that so many Muslims in Europe have. Unfortunately, as in Europe, they are mostly dependent. They are also self-segregating, and California are conducting wars of ethnic cleansing against blacks, whom they generally despise as competitors.</p>
<p>If current demographic trends continue, there will actually be more Americans than Europeans. This depends in part on a continuing robust reproductive rate in Mexico and Central America. Their reproductive rates are also rapidly falling, so the Latino population surplus of the past is likely to disappear, reducing immigration substantially.</p>
<p>Most news media like to quote the UN&#8217;s median population predictions, which suggest a world population rising continuously for the foreseeable future and exceeding 9 billion in a couple of decades. However, this projection assumes that each country&#8217;s population reproduces at the replacement rate. The world population increase is due to the predominance of young people in the world.</p>
<p>However, in every country in the world, the reproductive rate is falling rapidly. The low population projection uses these rates, and it predicts a maximum  world population of around 8 to 8.5 billion around 2030 and a decline thereafter. Then we (or you, I&#8217;ll be dead) enter the great unknown: a dominant USA in a declining world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
