<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Restrepo</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2013/01/restrepo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2013/01/restrepo/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:33:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isegoria</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2013/01/restrepo/comment-page-1/#comment-727383</link>
		<dc:creator>Isegoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 14:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=30808#comment-727383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, periscopic sights were definitely tried in World War I, and curved-barrel submachine-guns have been tried since.

Periscopic sights seem like they&#039;d make the most sense for tripod-mounted weapons, which don&#039;t need a well-positioned human body attached to keep them stable and on target.  The early &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periscope_rifle&quot;&gt;periscope rifles&lt;/a&gt; of World War I weren&#039;t especially accurate for that reason &#8212; and because they were built in the trenches with the equipment at hand.  I would expect modern optics and machining to greatly improve matters.

I find the idea of a curved-barrel gun rather silly, but a slightly periscopic sight that let you shoot around a corner &#8212; rather than over a trench &#8212; would let you keep your shoulder behind the gun but your head behind cover.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, periscopic sights were definitely tried in World War I, and curved-barrel submachine-guns have been tried since.</p>
<p>Periscopic sights seem like they&#8217;d make the most sense for tripod-mounted weapons, which don&#8217;t need a well-positioned human body attached to keep them stable and on target.  The early <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periscope_rifle">periscope rifles</a> of World War I weren&#8217;t especially accurate for that reason &mdash; and because they were built in the trenches with the equipment at hand.  I would expect modern optics and machining to greatly improve matters.</p>
<p>I find the idea of a curved-barrel gun rather silly, but a slightly periscopic sight that let you shoot around a corner &mdash; rather than over a trench &mdash; would let you keep your shoulder behind the gun but your head behind cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Walker</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2013/01/restrepo/comment-page-1/#comment-727248</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 13:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=30808#comment-727248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m pretty sure periscopic sights were tried in WWI, and in WWII the Germans tried a rifle (or submachine gun, can&#039;t recall) with a curved barrel for urban combat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure periscopic sights were tried in WWI, and in WWII the Germans tried a rifle (or submachine gun, can&#8217;t recall) with a curved barrel for urban combat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
