<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Foreign Language of Mad Men</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2012/09/the-foreign-language-of-mad-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2012/09/the-foreign-language-of-mad-men/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 16:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Etype</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2012/09/the-foreign-language-of-mad-men/comment-page-1/#comment-584966</link>
		<dc:creator>Etype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 07:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=29976#comment-584966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve often seen arguments like this. My first question is always... how is it that people believe a television show in 2012 in anyway accurately portrays a subset of reality taking place in 1960?

The foremost puzzler is how you can even discuss it. And that it is not taken for-granted immediately that television does not exist to transmit reality, nor the established internet.

The &#039;Man Men&#039; thing is creepily interesting, it is somehow coinciding with the observably greater incidence of people referring to television shows as if they were &#039;history&#039;.
(Similar to referring to Wikepedia as anything other than as &#039;information&#039; reality show @ Isegoria).

This phenomenon is far more troubling than a non event such as a retro television show not using period correct language. This just builds upon the underlying assumption, which should, in intelligent company, be considered insane.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve often seen arguments like this. My first question is always&#8230; how is it that people believe a television show in 2012 in anyway accurately portrays a subset of reality taking place in 1960?</p>
<p>The foremost puzzler is how you can even discuss it. And that it is not taken for-granted immediately that television does not exist to transmit reality, nor the established internet.</p>
<p>The &#8216;Man Men&#8217; thing is creepily interesting, it is somehow coinciding with the observably greater incidence of people referring to television shows as if they were &#8216;history&#8217;.<br />
(Similar to referring to Wikepedia as anything other than as &#8216;information&#8217; reality show @ Isegoria).</p>
<p>This phenomenon is far more troubling than a non event such as a retro television show not using period correct language. This just builds upon the underlying assumption, which should, in intelligent company, be considered insane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
