<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Core of Every Trick</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2012/03/the-core-of-every-trick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2012/03/the-core-of-every-trick/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 17:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alrenous</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2012/03/the-core-of-every-trick/comment-page-1/#comment-468552</link>
		<dc:creator>Alrenous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=28519#comment-468552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just figured out why I&#039;m not impressed by magicians.

Whenever I find out how a trick is done, it never changes how I think the world works. I mainly just learn again that I can be fooled, which is a bit of a no-brainer. 

This is why I listen to scientists at all. They have many tricks for detecting and rectifying foolage. As a bonus, they&#039;re individually simple. 

So I guess it does verify something else: magic tricks unambiguously set off the science klaxons. But then, if they didn&#039;t, it would just seem normal, not counter-intuitive at all, and wouldn&#039;t make a very good trick. Which sadly means it isn&#039;t a good test. Which means I need tricks that aren&#039;t supposed to be seen as tricks, for testing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just figured out why I&#8217;m not impressed by magicians.</p>
<p>Whenever I find out how a trick is done, it never changes how I think the world works. I mainly just learn again that I can be fooled, which is a bit of a no-brainer. </p>
<p>This is why I listen to scientists at all. They have many tricks for detecting and rectifying foolage. As a bonus, they&#8217;re individually simple. </p>
<p>So I guess it does verify something else: magic tricks unambiguously set off the science klaxons. But then, if they didn&#8217;t, it would just seem normal, not counter-intuitive at all, and wouldn&#8217;t make a very good trick. Which sadly means it isn&#8217;t a good test. Which means I need tricks that aren&#8217;t supposed to be seen as tricks, for testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
