<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Very Weird Career</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2012/01/a-very-weird-career/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2012/01/a-very-weird-career/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 21:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Charlton</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2012/01/a-very-weird-career/comment-page-1/#comment-409833</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Charlton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 09:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=27901#comment-409833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know &lt;em&gt;nothing&lt;/em&gt; of this chap, and have deliberately not found out anything before saying that this CV reads like one of somebody who is &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; motivated to do good scientific work. 

He sounds smart but unprincipled &#8212; which absolutely and permanently would rule him out from significant academic work.

I am not at all impressed; indeed people like this guy &lt;em&gt;seems&lt;/em&gt; to be have infiltrated everywhere and destroyed all possibility of good work in many fields &#8212; I&#039;m sick of them.  

This may well be an impression created by the interview, or by the journalist &#8212; but it is the definite impression. A CV phrased like this should set off alarm bells, not evoke approval...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know <em>nothing</em> of this chap, and have deliberately not found out anything before saying that this CV reads like one of somebody who is <em>not</em> motivated to do good scientific work. </p>
<p>He sounds smart but unprincipled &mdash; which absolutely and permanently would rule him out from significant academic work.</p>
<p>I am not at all impressed; indeed people like this guy <em>seems</em> to be have infiltrated everywhere and destroyed all possibility of good work in many fields &mdash; I&#8217;m sick of them.  </p>
<p>This may well be an impression created by the interview, or by the journalist &mdash; but it is the definite impression. A CV phrased like this should set off alarm bells, not evoke approval&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
