<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dwarf Wheat</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2011/12/dwarf-wheat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/12/dwarf-wheat/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 21:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alrenous</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/12/dwarf-wheat/comment-page-1/#comment-392227</link>
		<dc:creator>Alrenous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=27401#comment-392227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesn&#039;t sound like Borlaug was directly responsible. I&#039;m inferring that he used more traditional breeding techniques, not the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.trackyourplaque.com/blog/2011/09/an-open-letter-to-the-grain-foods-foundation.html&quot;&gt;problematic ones&lt;/a&gt;. 

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Why does the wheat industry continue to call chemical mutagenesis, gamma irradiation, and x-ray irradiation “traditional breeding techniques” that you distinguish from genetic engineering? Chemical mutagenesis using the toxic mutagen, sodium azide, of course, is the method used to generate BASF’s Clearfield herbicide-resistant wheat strain. These methods are being used on a wide scale to generate unique genetic strains that are, without question from the FDA or USDA, assumed to be safe for human consumption.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t sound like Borlaug was directly responsible. I&#8217;m inferring that he used more traditional breeding techniques, not the <a href="http://www.trackyourplaque.com/blog/2011/09/an-open-letter-to-the-grain-foods-foundation.html">problematic ones</a>. </p>
<p><i>&#8220;Why does the wheat industry continue to call chemical mutagenesis, gamma irradiation, and x-ray irradiation “traditional breeding techniques” that you distinguish from genetic engineering? Chemical mutagenesis using the toxic mutagen, sodium azide, of course, is the method used to generate BASF’s Clearfield herbicide-resistant wheat strain. These methods are being used on a wide scale to generate unique genetic strains that are, without question from the FDA or USDA, assumed to be safe for human consumption.&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
