<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Religious People Are Nerds</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2011/10/religious-people-are-nerds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/10/religious-people-are-nerds/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 21:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/10/religious-people-are-nerds/comment-page-1/#comment-353861</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 15:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=26813#comment-353861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another problem - the video uses &quot;religious people&quot; to mean approximately &quot;Christians&quot;. Numerous religions aren&#039;t evangelizing. Some don&#039;t even accept converts. Nor do all religions have a sacred scripture to hold proof-texting arguments over.

The video makes an exemption, too, for &quot;not all religious people, like not this guy&quot;.

Any one of these could have been understandable, since a lot of humor involves squinting to see how something looks like something else. But with all three objections together, &quot;Religious people are nerds&quot; has turned into &quot;A subset of Christians are passionate&quot;, which isn&#039;t funny to me. The joke just falls flat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another problem &#8211; the video uses &#8220;religious people&#8221; to mean approximately &#8220;Christians&#8221;. Numerous religions aren&#8217;t evangelizing. Some don&#8217;t even accept converts. Nor do all religions have a sacred scripture to hold proof-texting arguments over.</p>
<p>The video makes an exemption, too, for &#8220;not all religious people, like not this guy&#8221;.</p>
<p>Any one of these could have been understandable, since a lot of humor involves squinting to see how something looks like something else. But with all three objections together, &#8220;Religious people are nerds&#8221; has turned into &#8220;A subset of Christians are passionate&#8221;, which isn&#8217;t funny to me. The joke just falls flat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/10/religious-people-are-nerds/comment-page-1/#comment-353848</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=26813#comment-353848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The video appears to be broadly interpreting nerds as &quot;non-apathetic people&quot;. But by this analysis, jocks are also nerds. This is a poor definition that doesn&#039;t capture the group being referred to by &quot;nerds&quot; in ordinary usage. It&#039;s as though someone defined &quot;fire&quot; to mean reddish-orange moving things and claiming that his bicycle was made of fire.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The video appears to be broadly interpreting nerds as &#8220;non-apathetic people&#8221;. But by this analysis, jocks are also nerds. This is a poor definition that doesn&#8217;t capture the group being referred to by &#8220;nerds&#8221; in ordinary usage. It&#8217;s as though someone defined &#8220;fire&#8221; to mean reddish-orange moving things and claiming that his bicycle was made of fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
