<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where is the Next Steve Jobs?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2011/09/where-is-the-next-steve-jobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/09/where-is-the-next-steve-jobs/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 01:12:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Foster</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/09/where-is-the-next-steve-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-335552</link>
		<dc:creator>David Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=26337#comment-335552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the link. I&#039;d also note that not every company is susceptible to being run with Jobs-style management.  General Electric, for instance, could not in my view be run &lt;em&gt;at all&lt;/em&gt; with a Jobsian approach at the top: no human could involve himself in the details of jet engines, locomotives, appliances, financial services, lighting, etc. in the way that Steve Jobs has involved himself in every detail of Apple. A GE &lt;em&gt;division&lt;/em&gt;, on the other hand, could be and possibly should be run with a Jobsian approach, but not the overall company.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link. I&#8217;d also note that not every company is susceptible to being run with Jobs-style management.  General Electric, for instance, could not in my view be run <em>at all</em> with a Jobsian approach at the top: no human could involve himself in the details of jet engines, locomotives, appliances, financial services, lighting, etc. in the way that Steve Jobs has involved himself in every detail of Apple. A GE <em>division</em>, on the other hand, could be and possibly should be run with a Jobsian approach, but not the overall company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
