<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whatever happened to Nuclear Terrorism?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2011/09/whatever-happened-to-nuclear-terrorism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/09/whatever-happened-to-nuclear-terrorism/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:55:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Pat</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/09/whatever-happened-to-nuclear-terrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-352413</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=26629#comment-352413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re not actually supposed to put ideas that easy to implement on the Internet.

I did it once in a forum discussion, mentioned some extremely straightforward thing that would probably take out a city. I thought it was obvious, but the replies I got indicated that nobody else understood it. I realized that if I was to explain the details, then I&#039;d be putting out information that was clearly &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; obvious. And that if anyone ever did it I&#039;d be wondering for the rest of my life if I was partly responsible.

So now I only discuss such things with people I actually know &lt;abbr title=&quot;In Real Life&quot;&gt;IRL&lt;/abbr&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not actually supposed to put ideas that easy to implement on the Internet.</p>
<p>I did it once in a forum discussion, mentioned some extremely straightforward thing that would probably take out a city. I thought it was obvious, but the replies I got indicated that nobody else understood it. I realized that if I was to explain the details, then I&#8217;d be putting out information that was clearly <em>not</em> obvious. And that if anyone ever did it I&#8217;d be wondering for the rest of my life if I was partly responsible.</p>
<p>So now I only discuss such things with people I actually know <abbr title="In Real Life">IRL</abbr>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sconzey</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/09/whatever-happened-to-nuclear-terrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-352088</link>
		<dc:creator>Sconzey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=26629#comment-352088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to work for a defense contractor. Incredible colleagues; the kind of guys you hope never become terrorists.

One of them argued that in fact the simplest nuclear weapon (assuming one has suitably enriched plutonium) is to rent out a whole floor of an office block, remove all the internal partitions, lay a pipe diagonally across the middle, separate your fissile material into two sub-critical masses, put them into opposite ends of the tube, pack the ends behind the fissile material with cordite, or blasting caps, or whatever. He said you&#039;d get a lot of fizzling and very little efficiency, but it would go &quot;boom&quot;. 

Using a skyscraper allows you to get the height to most efficiently use you tiny explosion.

I think he said that would only work with plutonium as well.

Every day I thank God he uses his powers for good, and not evil.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to work for a defense contractor. Incredible colleagues; the kind of guys you hope never become terrorists.</p>
<p>One of them argued that in fact the simplest nuclear weapon (assuming one has suitably enriched plutonium) is to rent out a whole floor of an office block, remove all the internal partitions, lay a pipe diagonally across the middle, separate your fissile material into two sub-critical masses, put them into opposite ends of the tube, pack the ends behind the fissile material with cordite, or blasting caps, or whatever. He said you&#8217;d get a lot of fizzling and very little efficiency, but it would go &#8220;boom&#8221;. </p>
<p>Using a skyscraper allows you to get the height to most efficiently use you tiny explosion.</p>
<p>I think he said that would only work with plutonium as well.</p>
<p>Every day I thank God he uses his powers for good, and not evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
