<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Polar Bear Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2011/09/the-polar-bear-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/09/the-polar-bear-problem/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 20:16:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alrenous</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/09/the-polar-bear-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-340676</link>
		<dc:creator>Alrenous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=26216#comment-340676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found out that climate records are meaningless. Weather is a forced oscillator, which follows the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_distribution&quot;&gt;Cauchy-Lorentz&lt;/a&gt; distribution. The Cauchy distribution has no mean, basically because it has fat tails. So fat that the odds of very large values drops less fast than the values grow. 

Two consequences.
&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;The more dramatic a weather record is, the less it tells you about the distribution.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;As measurement continues, the odds of seeing a new record grow faster than linearly, which means that all weather records are likely to be recent. (If the previous record was a ten-year high, it will generally be beaten in less than ten years, and so on.)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found out that climate records are meaningless. Weather is a forced oscillator, which follows the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_distribution">Cauchy-Lorentz</a> distribution. The Cauchy distribution has no mean, basically because it has fat tails. So fat that the odds of very large values drops less fast than the values grow. </p>
<p>Two consequences.</p>
<ol>
<li>The more dramatic a weather record is, the less it tells you about the distribution.</li>
<li>As measurement continues, the odds of seeing a new record grow faster than linearly, which means that all weather records are likely to be recent. (If the previous record was a ten-year high, it will generally be beaten in less than ten years, and so on.)</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
