<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Logic of Failure</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2011/09/the-logic-of-failure-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/09/the-logic-of-failure-2/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:25:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alrenous</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/09/the-logic-of-failure-2/comment-page-1/#comment-351673</link>
		<dc:creator>Alrenous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=26726#comment-351673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve called [reification of abstractions] &lt;em&gt;abstraction intoxication disease&lt;/em&gt;. I suspect the causation is that the working memory is saturated with abstractions, leaving no room for the concrete manifestations of the abstractions. 

It&#039;s a natural mistake when thinking about systems much more complex than working memory. Chunking helps. Also, studying physics. 

I&#039;m beginning to suspect that feeling of having learned something isn&#039;t an error. No, wait &#8212; having written that out I&#039;m certain. However, subjects think it indicates domain knowledge, and it&#039;s actually something else, like ability to &quot;win&quot; arguments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve called [reification of abstractions] <em>abstraction intoxication disease</em>. I suspect the causation is that the working memory is saturated with abstractions, leaving no room for the concrete manifestations of the abstractions. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a natural mistake when thinking about systems much more complex than working memory. Chunking helps. Also, studying physics. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m beginning to suspect that feeling of having learned something isn&#8217;t an error. No, wait &mdash; having written that out I&#8217;m certain. However, subjects think it indicates domain knowledge, and it&#8217;s actually something else, like ability to &#8220;win&#8221; arguments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Fouche</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/09/the-logic-of-failure-2/comment-page-1/#comment-350936</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Fouche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=26726#comment-350936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is consistent with recent suggestions that reasoning didn&#039;t evolve for discovering truth but for winning arguments. The MBA is vomited from business school ready for winning arguments but not for something like, say, business.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is consistent with recent suggestions that reasoning didn&#8217;t evolve for discovering truth but for winning arguments. The MBA is vomited from business school ready for winning arguments but not for something like, say, business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
