<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hell’s First Cousin</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2011/06/hells-first-cousin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/06/hells-first-cousin/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 14:48:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isegoria</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/06/hells-first-cousin/comment-page-1/#comment-271461</link>
		<dc:creator>Isegoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=25201#comment-271461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe that Lind would agree with the notions that (a) we should stop sending soldiers into guerrilla wars they&#039;re not prepared for, and (b) we should stop preparing soldiers for guerrilla wars rather than &quot;real&quot; wars.  I don&#039;t think he would recommend training a second force for police actions and nation-building though, because he considers that kind of thing futile.  Mencius Moldbug would likely add that the futility comes from our lack of will to &lt;em&gt;grasp the nettle&lt;/em&gt; and truly &lt;em&gt;rule&lt;/em&gt; those regions we want to pacify.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that Lind would agree with the notions that (a) we should stop sending soldiers into guerrilla wars they&#8217;re not prepared for, and (b) we should stop preparing soldiers for guerrilla wars rather than &#8220;real&#8221; wars.  I don&#8217;t think he would recommend training a second force for police actions and nation-building though, because he considers that kind of thing futile.  Mencius Moldbug would likely add that the futility comes from our lack of will to <em>grasp the nettle</em> and truly <em>rule</em> those regions we want to pacify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Pat</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/06/hells-first-cousin/comment-page-1/#comment-270672</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=25201#comment-270672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the other hand, Barnett&#039;s strategy &#8212; rather than his strategic goal &#8212; sounds completely compatible with the referred to work of Martin van Creveld. Namely, that there are low-intensity, guerrilla conflicts that shade into police actions and nation building. And there are also conventional, &lt;em&gt;tank columns and jet fighters&lt;/em&gt;-style wars. And the army that is trained and equipped to deal with one is unsuited to the other. 

Hence, Barnett&#039;s idea that you should stop sending soldiers into wars they aren&#039;t suited for, and you should not compromise your preparation and end up with troops suited for neither situation, but you should just have two different forces. That way you aren&#039;t sending tanks against teenagers throwing rocks, and you aren&#039;t sending youth workers against tanks.

If you &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; going to go around fighting wars &#8212; a big &lt;em&gt;if&lt;/em&gt;, I&#039;ll admit &#8212; then it&#039;s better to not be an idiot about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand, Barnett&#8217;s strategy &mdash; rather than his strategic goal &mdash; sounds completely compatible with the referred to work of Martin van Creveld. Namely, that there are low-intensity, guerrilla conflicts that shade into police actions and nation building. And there are also conventional, <em>tank columns and jet fighters</em>-style wars. And the army that is trained and equipped to deal with one is unsuited to the other. </p>
<p>Hence, Barnett&#8217;s idea that you should stop sending soldiers into wars they aren&#8217;t suited for, and you should not compromise your preparation and end up with troops suited for neither situation, but you should just have two different forces. That way you aren&#8217;t sending tanks against teenagers throwing rocks, and you aren&#8217;t sending youth workers against tanks.</p>
<p>If you <em>are</em> going to go around fighting wars &mdash; a big <em>if</em>, I&#8217;ll admit &mdash; then it&#8217;s better to not be an idiot about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
