<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strangers in our midst</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2011/01/strangers-in-our-midst/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/01/strangers-in-our-midst/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 09:53:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tatyana</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/01/strangers-in-our-midst/comment-page-1/#comment-102949</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatyana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=23204#comment-102949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[College administrators didn&#039;t see that guy as dangerous because there is no emphasis in their job description on tracking down the insane, or, to put it delicately, &quot;troubled&quot; students.

If we move this situation to another environment, the difference in attitudes might be clearer. Let&#039;s say a person like this is working for a firm, somewhere on lower steps of the ladder. He has a supervisor, and a manager, and a department lead above him. If several women took either of these three people aside and complained about rude behavior of the guy, he would be reprimanded and taken a note of (at the least) &#8212; if not for violating personal moral code of the administration then for fear of lawsuits. Further on, when the guy gets caught cheating on a work assignment that could result in monetary damages to the firm &#8212; that is even more serious. I&#039;d say, at this point the guy will be out the door in no time. And if after the threatening letters start, criminal investigation will be started by ex-employers. Not &quot;talks&quot; behind the scenes, etc.

There is no direct connection between college administrators, their jobs/bank accounts, and an insane student who exhibits anti-social behavior. They don&#039;t feel wounded in their wallets. Until it changes, modeling on business world, there will always be cases like the one discussed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>College administrators didn&#8217;t see that guy as dangerous because there is no emphasis in their job description on tracking down the insane, or, to put it delicately, &#8220;troubled&#8221; students.</p>
<p>If we move this situation to another environment, the difference in attitudes might be clearer. Let&#8217;s say a person like this is working for a firm, somewhere on lower steps of the ladder. He has a supervisor, and a manager, and a department lead above him. If several women took either of these three people aside and complained about rude behavior of the guy, he would be reprimanded and taken a note of (at the least) &mdash; if not for violating personal moral code of the administration then for fear of lawsuits. Further on, when the guy gets caught cheating on a work assignment that could result in monetary damages to the firm &mdash; that is even more serious. I&#8217;d say, at this point the guy will be out the door in no time. And if after the threatening letters start, criminal investigation will be started by ex-employers. Not &#8220;talks&#8221; behind the scenes, etc.</p>
<p>There is no direct connection between college administrators, their jobs/bank accounts, and an insane student who exhibits anti-social behavior. They don&#8217;t feel wounded in their wallets. Until it changes, modeling on business world, there will always be cases like the one discussed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
