<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Group IQ</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2011/01/group-iq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/01/group-iq/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 13:20:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isegoria</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/01/group-iq/comment-page-1/#comment-95139</link>
		<dc:creator>Isegoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=23088#comment-95139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The executive&#039;s job is made especially challenging by the way he&#039;s fed information from not-so-impartial sources.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The executive&#8217;s job is made especially challenging by the way he&#8217;s fed information from not-so-impartial sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isegoria</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/01/group-iq/comment-page-1/#comment-95137</link>
		<dc:creator>Isegoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=23088#comment-95137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ideally, the group would get any question right if &lt;em&gt;anyone&lt;/em&gt; in the group got it right. So, the best group score would come from a diverse group that could recognize when &lt;em&gt;someone&lt;/em&gt; had the right answer &#8212; either because everyone had a clear area of expertise, or because the answers were easy to verify, as with many brain-teasers.  The worst group score would come from like-minded individuals who all thought they knew more than everyone else about everything &#8212; like, say, a group of young MBAs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ideally, the group would get any question right if <em>anyone</em> in the group got it right. So, the best group score would come from a diverse group that could recognize when <em>someone</em> had the right answer &mdash; either because everyone had a clear area of expertise, or because the answers were easy to verify, as with many brain-teasers.  The worst group score would come from like-minded individuals who all thought they knew more than everyone else about everything &mdash; like, say, a group of young MBAs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Foster</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/01/group-iq/comment-page-1/#comment-94049</link>
		<dc:creator>David Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 14:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=23088#comment-94049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Intuitively, we still attribute too much to individuals and not enough to groups. Part of that may just be that it’s simpler; it’s simpler to say the success of a company depended on the CEO for good or bad, but in reality the success of a company depends on a whole lot more,&quot; said Tom Malone.

This is a little simplistic. Few knowledgeable people think the reason the company&#039;s success depends on the CEO is because he makes all the decisions himself; rather, the CEO hires people, who in turn hire other people, who sent the tone and the way things are done, which does indeed have a great deal to do with the collective intelligence of the group.

There are of course long time-lags in this process: at GE, for example, the kind of culture that Jack Welch built surely still has a huge impact on what his successor Jeff Immelt is and is not able to accomplish, a decade later.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Intuitively, we still attribute too much to individuals and not enough to groups. Part of that may just be that it’s simpler; it’s simpler to say the success of a company depended on the CEO for good or bad, but in reality the success of a company depends on a whole lot more,&#8221; said Tom Malone.</p>
<p>This is a little simplistic. Few knowledgeable people think the reason the company&#8217;s success depends on the CEO is because he makes all the decisions himself; rather, the CEO hires people, who in turn hire other people, who sent the tone and the way things are done, which does indeed have a great deal to do with the collective intelligence of the group.</p>
<p>There are of course long time-lags in this process: at GE, for example, the kind of culture that Jack Welch built surely still has a huge impact on what his successor Jeff Immelt is and is not able to accomplish, a decade later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Abacus</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/01/group-iq/comment-page-1/#comment-92738</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Abacus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 01:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=23088#comment-92738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sounds like they are really talking about group dysfunction.

Two things I&#039;d like to see:

1. The subjects run through the tasks individually.  I suspect that the average individual score will be higher than the average group score.

2. The groups asked to do really hard tasks &#8212; the last 10% of raven&#039;s progressive matrices, for example.  I suspect that, to do well in such a task, IQ is necessary but not sufficient (i.e. well functioning groups are not smarter than their members).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like they are really talking about group dysfunction.</p>
<p>Two things I&#8217;d like to see:</p>
<p>1. The subjects run through the tasks individually.  I suspect that the average individual score will be higher than the average group score.</p>
<p>2. The groups asked to do really hard tasks &mdash; the last 10% of raven&#8217;s progressive matrices, for example.  I suspect that, to do well in such a task, IQ is necessary but not sufficient (i.e. well functioning groups are not smarter than their members).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
