<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Answer to Green Energy Could Be in the Air</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2011/01/an-answer-to-green-energy-could-be-in-the-air/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/01/an-answer-to-green-energy-could-be-in-the-air/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 13:20:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cruft</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2011/01/an-answer-to-green-energy-could-be-in-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-92294</link>
		<dc:creator>Cruft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 15:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=23085#comment-92294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;cite&gt;Popular Mechanics&lt;/cite&gt; or &lt;cite&gt;Science&lt;/cite&gt; had an article on this 30 years ago.  What&#039;s the over/under on seeing it in another 30 years?  There are a plethora of reasonable answers to the supply of energy, but these are not in the benefit of those that own the governments.  &lt;em&gt;Cui bono.&lt;/em&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><cite>Popular Mechanics</cite> or <cite>Science</cite> had an article on this 30 years ago.  What&#8217;s the over/under on seeing it in another 30 years?  There are a plethora of reasonable answers to the supply of energy, but these are not in the benefit of those that own the governments.  <em>Cui bono.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
