<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cultural Hegemony</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2010/07/cultural-hegemony/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2010/07/cultural-hegemony/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 06:11:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Speirs</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2010/07/cultural-hegemony/comment-page-1/#comment-10643</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Speirs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 11:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=21201#comment-10643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lee Harris just doesn&#039;t get it, though, does he?  The &quot;Tea Party&quot; isn&#039;t a party.  It is a set of ideas.  Republicans can&#039;t &quot;join the Tea Party&quot;, although they can adopt its ideas  The clearest picture I have seen of this distinction was at a Tea Party rally where the Republican Party had set up a table with literature on it.  The whole time I was there I saw no one approach it.  The conventional conservatives were shunned.  They had allowed themselves and their ideas to be trodden upon by the Gramscian collectivists too many times.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee Harris just doesn&#8217;t get it, though, does he?  The &#8220;Tea Party&#8221; isn&#8217;t a party.  It is a set of ideas.  Republicans can&#8217;t &#8220;join the Tea Party&#8221;, although they can adopt its ideas  The clearest picture I have seen of this distinction was at a Tea Party rally where the Republican Party had set up a table with literature on it.  The whole time I was there I saw no one approach it.  The conventional conservatives were shunned.  They had allowed themselves and their ideas to be trodden upon by the Gramscian collectivists too many times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
