<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tax Hikes and the 2011 Economic Collapse</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2010/06/tax-hikes-and-the-2011-economic-collapse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2010/06/tax-hikes-and-the-2011-economic-collapse/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 02:09:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isegoria</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2010/06/tax-hikes-and-the-2011-economic-collapse/comment-page-1/#comment-4223</link>
		<dc:creator>Isegoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=6494#comment-4223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both the traditional &lt;abbr title=&quot;Individual Retirement Account&quot;&gt;IRA&lt;/abbr&gt; and the Roth IRA allow an investment to &lt;em&gt;compound&lt;/em&gt; without annual taxation. The difference is that the traditional IRA is taxed at the &lt;em&gt;end&lt;/em&gt;, at retirement age, at whatever tax rate is in effect then, while the Roth IRA is taxed up front, as ordinary income, at today&#039;s (known) tax rate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both the traditional <abbr title="Individual Retirement Account">IRA</abbr> and the Roth IRA allow an investment to <em>compound</em> without annual taxation. The difference is that the traditional IRA is taxed at the <em>end</em>, at retirement age, at whatever tax rate is in effect then, while the Roth IRA is taxed up front, as ordinary income, at today&#8217;s (known) tax rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2010/06/tax-hikes-and-the-2011-economic-collapse/comment-page-1/#comment-4220</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=6494#comment-4220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laffer&#039;s always made sense to me. While I very much liked the tone/content of his latest WSJ op-ed piece, I remain confused by his closing recommendation, which was to dump 401k/Keough plans and shuttle monies (after paying taxes) into Roth IRA&#039;s. The argument was, I think, that if tax rates go up, this is somehow more protective. Don&#039;t 401k&#039;s temporarily shelter from taxes as it is? In my ignorance of accounting/tax law, I don&#039;t see the additional value of shifting to Roth, but would be happy to see a mini-tutorial from a savvy Isegorian on the topic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laffer&#8217;s always made sense to me. While I very much liked the tone/content of his latest WSJ op-ed piece, I remain confused by his closing recommendation, which was to dump 401k/Keough plans and shuttle monies (after paying taxes) into Roth IRA&#8217;s. The argument was, I think, that if tax rates go up, this is somehow more protective. Don&#8217;t 401k&#8217;s temporarily shelter from taxes as it is? In my ignorance of accounting/tax law, I don&#8217;t see the additional value of shifting to Roth, but would be happy to see a mini-tutorial from a savvy Isegorian on the topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
