<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smoking&#8217;s bad for you, right?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2010/06/smokings-bad-for-you-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2010/06/smokings-bad-for-you-right/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 21:33:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isegoria</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2010/06/smokings-bad-for-you-right/comment-page-1/#comment-4024</link>
		<dc:creator>Isegoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=6441#comment-4024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t personally smoke, but I have noted before that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isegoria.net/2008/09/nicotine-is-largely-harmless/&quot;&gt;the nicotine in cigarettes is largely harmless&lt;/a&gt;, even if cigarettes aren&#039;t, and that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isegoria.net/2009/01/tobacco-road-takes-a-turn-to-the-smokeless/&quot;&gt;smokeless &lt;em&gt;snus&lt;/em&gt; seems remarkably safe&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isegoria.net/2009/06/cigarettes-without-smoke-or-regulation/&quot;&gt;E-cigarettes&lt;/a&gt; are another option, but &#8212; &lt;em&gt;gasp!&lt;/em&gt; &#8212; they&#039;re &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isegoria.net/2009/06/controversy-swirls-around-e-cigarettes/&quot;&gt;not regulated&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t personally smoke, but I have noted before that <a href="http://www.isegoria.net/2008/09/nicotine-is-largely-harmless/">the nicotine in cigarettes is largely harmless</a>, even if cigarettes aren&#8217;t, and that <a href="http://www.isegoria.net/2009/01/tobacco-road-takes-a-turn-to-the-smokeless/">smokeless <em>snus</em> seems remarkably safe</a>. <a href="http://www.isegoria.net/2009/06/cigarettes-without-smoke-or-regulation/">E-cigarettes</a> are another option, but &mdash; <em>gasp!</em> &mdash; they&#8217;re <a href="http://www.isegoria.net/2009/06/controversy-swirls-around-e-cigarettes/">not regulated</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2010/06/smokings-bad-for-you-right/comment-page-1/#comment-4019</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=6441#comment-4019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an on/off smoker this is a topic of longstanding interest to me. 

Inhaling any kind of burning organic matter (coal, dope, diesel/gas, tobacco, barbeque fumes) is &lt;em&gt;not good&lt;/em&gt;; the central questions of &quot;What&quot; and &quot;How Much&quot; and &quot;How Long&quot; are far, far more important than an imbecilic obsession with the boolean &quot;Do you smoke?&quot;  (Yes: you&#039;re evil. No: you&#039;re virtuous.) 

[One &lt;a href=&quot;http://fauxbacco.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;good resource&lt;/a&gt;. For those interested in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cultivatorshandbook.com&quot;&gt;tobacco preparation and history&lt;/a&gt;.]

I smoke organic and non-additive, roll-yer-own tobacco at home. (Frustratingly, I find morons simply assume I believe this makes it &quot;healthy&quot;. Nope. Smoking organic anything is not &lt;em&gt;healthy&lt;/em&gt; per se; it&#039;s simply that &lt;em&gt;no pesticides&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;no additives&lt;/em&gt; (e.g. asbestos) make for a less toxic assault.)

Having done multi-year quits multiple times, I&#039;d like to share two things I&#039;ve noticed. One, quitting pure tobacco is an order of magnitude easier than quitting commercial box cigarettes. Two, I feel I need/want much less pure tobacco than commercial tobacco (4 a day versus 30+ a day). 

Oh, and it tastes a lot better. Mmm, mmm good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an on/off smoker this is a topic of longstanding interest to me. </p>
<p>Inhaling any kind of burning organic matter (coal, dope, diesel/gas, tobacco, barbeque fumes) is <em>not good</em>; the central questions of &#8220;What&#8221; and &#8220;How Much&#8221; and &#8220;How Long&#8221; are far, far more important than an imbecilic obsession with the boolean &#8220;Do you smoke?&#8221;  (Yes: you&#8217;re evil. No: you&#8217;re virtuous.) </p>
<p>[One <a href="http://fauxbacco.blogspot.com/">good resource</a>. For those interested in <a href="http://www.cultivatorshandbook.com">tobacco preparation and history</a>.]</p>
<p>I smoke organic and non-additive, roll-yer-own tobacco at home. (Frustratingly, I find morons simply assume I believe this makes it &#8220;healthy&#8221;. Nope. Smoking organic anything is not <em>healthy</em> per se; it&#8217;s simply that <em>no pesticides</em> and <em>no additives</em> (e.g. asbestos) make for a less toxic assault.)</p>
<p>Having done multi-year quits multiple times, I&#8217;d like to share two things I&#8217;ve noticed. One, quitting pure tobacco is an order of magnitude easier than quitting commercial box cigarettes. Two, I feel I need/want much less pure tobacco than commercial tobacco (4 a day versus 30+ a day). </p>
<p>Oh, and it tastes a lot better. Mmm, mmm good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
