<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creativity is not rewarded</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.isegoria.net/2010/04/creativity-is-not-rewarded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2010/04/creativity-is-not-rewarded/</link>
	<description>From the ancient Greek for equality in freedom of speech; an eclectic mix of thoughts, large and small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:33:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham J.</title>
		<link>https://www.isegoria.net/2010/04/creativity-is-not-rewarded/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isegoria.net/?p=5209#comment-171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s also an interesting comparison to be made between the British and American educational systems (at least as regards higher education). 

My undergrad college in the US was very writing-intensive: for every seminar you were in, you met one-on-one with the professor every other week and worked on a &#039;conference paper&#039; related to the subject of the class, but not specifically tied to a particular unit. Even for the normal class papers, you were generally given a single broad topic, and the thesis itself was up to you.

For the Master&#039;s I&#039;m doing in the UK right now, it&#039;s very different. Your paper topics must be pulled directly from a list of narrow questions. But that&#039;s not even the part that bothers me. My US papers all had interesting titles, like &quot;Privates and Patriots: Interpretations of the Battle of Concord,&quot; and &quot;For Love of Country? Britain, France, and the Multiethnic Imperial Army.&quot; 

When I tried to write an interesting title in the UK that pretty clearly reflected the chosen question, &quot;Is there an Anglo-American Special Relationship? If so, why?&quot; I came up with &quot;Forged in Battle, Sealed with Blood: Whither the Special Relationship?&quot; I got points taken off. Apparently I need to just repeat the question so that the intellectual powers of the professor aren&#039;t overly taxed.

/rant]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s also an interesting comparison to be made between the British and American educational systems (at least as regards higher education). </p>
<p>My undergrad college in the US was very writing-intensive: for every seminar you were in, you met one-on-one with the professor every other week and worked on a &#8216;conference paper&#8217; related to the subject of the class, but not specifically tied to a particular unit. Even for the normal class papers, you were generally given a single broad topic, and the thesis itself was up to you.</p>
<p>For the Master&#8217;s I&#8217;m doing in the UK right now, it&#8217;s very different. Your paper topics must be pulled directly from a list of narrow questions. But that&#8217;s not even the part that bothers me. My US papers all had interesting titles, like &#8220;Privates and Patriots: Interpretations of the Battle of Concord,&#8221; and &#8220;For Love of Country? Britain, France, and the Multiethnic Imperial Army.&#8221; </p>
<p>When I tried to write an interesting title in the UK that pretty clearly reflected the chosen question, &#8220;Is there an Anglo-American Special Relationship? If so, why?&#8221; I came up with &#8220;Forged in Battle, Sealed with Blood: Whither the Special Relationship?&#8221; I got points taken off. Apparently I need to just repeat the question so that the intellectual powers of the professor aren&#8217;t overly taxed.</p>
<p>/rant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
