Tetrachromats

Tuesday, November 18th, 2014

Ordinary people have three kinds of cones in their eyes, attuned to red, green, and blue, but a few people, mostly women, are tetrachromats, with four kinds of cones:

For years, researchers weren’t sure tetrachromacy existed. If it did, they stipulated, it could only be found in people with two X chromosomes. This is because of the genes behind color vision. People who have regular color vision have three cones, tuned to the wavelengths of red, green, and blue. These are connected to the X chromosome — most men have only one, but most women have two. Mutations in the X chromosome cause a person to perceive more or less color, which is why men more commonly have congenital colorblindness than women (if their one X chromosome has a mutation). But the theory stood that if a person received two mutated X chromosomes, she could have four cones instead of the usual three.

Note the use of most in that paragraph:

The original story stated that all men have one X and one Y chromosome and that all women have two X chromosomes. This statement neglected to include those with Klinefelter Syndrome and transgender individuals. We regret the error.

(Hat tip to T. Greer.)

Comments

  1. James James says:

    The distinction between sex and gender.

  2. James James says:

    XKCD tried to bypass the question for a survey, asking “Do you have a Y chromosome?”, and people still complained.

    He goes on:

    “We recently programmed Bucket, the IRC chat bot in #xkcd, to allow people set their gender so he can use pronouns for them. This ended up taking hundreds of lines of code, three pages of documentation, and six different sets of pronouns and variables…”

  3. There’s a nice plan enacted here:

    1) Make “gender” a more polite form of “sex”
    2) Rewrite documents to use “gender” instead of “sex”
    3) Define “gender” to be a personal choice and a social construction

    Et voila, when someone says “men” they must have forgotten the transgendered and need to apologize.

    What cracks me up is that people use gender all the time when they mean sex and do so because they think it is the polite thing to do. Then they fall into the trap of the definition of gender.

    And they do talk about it.

  4. Alrenous says:

    Actually your cones are attuned to greenish-yellow, yellowish-green, and purple. This particular tetrachromat’s extra cone is apparently orange.

  5. Isegoria says:

    Here is how Wikipedia explains it:

    Humans normally have three kinds of cones. The first responds the most to light of long wavelengths, peaking at a reddish colour; this type is sometimes designated L for long. The second type responds the most to light of medium-wavelength, peaking at a green colour, and is abbreviated M for medium. The third type responds the most to short-wavelength light, of a bluish colour, and is designated S for short. The three types have peak wavelengths near 564–580 nm, 534–545 nm, and 420–440 nm, respectively, depending on the individual.[10][11] The difference in the signals received from the three cone types allows the brain to perceive a continuous range of colours, through the opponent process of colour vision. (Rod cells have a peak sensitivity at 498 nm, roughly halfway between the peak sensitivities of the S and M cones.)

    All of the receptors contain the protein photopsin, with variations in its conformation causing differences in the optimum wavelengths absorbed.

    The colour yellow, for example, is perceived when the L cones are stimulated slightly more than the M cones, and the colour red is perceived when the L cones are stimulated significantly more than the M cones. Similarly, blue and violet hues are perceived when the S receptor is stimulated more than the other two.

  6. Alrenous says:

    I used Wikipedia’s own numbers and cross-referenced them with Wikipedia. 570, 550, and 430, roughly speaking. Yellow ends at 560, blue at 450.
    This source puts yellow at 570 and green at 510. That would make it yellow, greenish-yellow, and indigo.

Leave a Reply